On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 18:44, Brett Porter wrote: > Also needed for the source Xreference and the checkstyle reports. the > metrics are ok - they must be using the set.
Written down and I will get to them, but if you want to patch them and test them first they will probably get done faster :-) > Cheers, > Brett > > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 16:54, Brett Porter wrote: > > > >>Hi Jason, > >> > >>This is the technique I used - thanks. However, this doesn't add the > >>files to the javadoc generation list. > > > > > > That isn't very consistent is it :-) > > > > > >>Do you think it is appropriate that javadoc uses compile.src.set? Or > >>should there be a javadoc.src.set? At the moment, the javadoc plugin is > >>just using a single src directory in the ant task, but I'd like to be > >>able to include all source, generated source and test directories in the > >>one set. > > > > > > Yes, a mutable source set would probably be best in this case to allow > > for generation as the compilation phase does. > > > > Off the top of my head I think that compile.src.set would suffice but > > we'll leave it for a couple hours and see if anyone else chimes in. > > We'll pop a src set in there soon though to make it consistent. Good > > catch. > > > > > >>Cheers, > >>Brett > >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
