Weaver, Scott wrote: > Yes, I use both. I admit that OJB does have quite a bit more flexibilty > than Torque. What would be great is see Torque be able to generate OJB > specific code and repository information. It may be something I'll try on > the side if I have time.
i started to do some ojb generation within the torque repo this stuff will go to the ojb repo when it's moved to jakarta (one +1 missing for acceptance of ojb as jakarta top-level project :-) there is some ojb support in jetspeed. ojb will be supported as component in one of the next releases :-) martin > > scott > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Slava Zimine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:28 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: turbine and OJB >> >> >>Is anybody using turbine ( 2.2 ) with ObjectBridge (OJB) >> instead of torque >> >>http://objectbridge.sourceforge.net/ >> >>OJB is a more advanced OR mapping project than torque. >> >>It will be nice to share the experience. >> >>Regards, >>Slava >> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
