> i started to do some ojb generation within the torque repo > this stuff will go to the ojb repo when it's moved to jakarta > (one +1 missing for acceptance of ojb > as jakarta top-level project :-)
That's GREAT news! I would love to see OJB as a Jakarta project! Thanks for the info, Martin. scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Poeschl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:35 AM > To: Turbine Users List > Subject: Re: turbine and OJB > > > Weaver, Scott wrote: > > Yes, I use both. I admit that OJB does have quite a bit > more flexibilty > > than Torque. What would be great is see Torque be able to > generate OJB > > specific code and repository information. It may be > something I'll try on > > the side if I have time. > > i started to do some ojb generation within the torque repo > this stuff will go to the ojb repo when it's moved to jakarta > (one +1 missing for acceptance of ojb > as jakarta top-level project :-) > > there is some ojb support in jetspeed. ojb will be supported > as component in one of the next > releases :-) > > martin > > > > > scott > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Slava Zimine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:28 PM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: turbine and OJB > >> > >> > >>Is anybody using turbine ( 2.2 ) with ObjectBridge (OJB) > >> instead of torque > >> > >>http://objectbridge.sourceforge.net/ > >> > >>OJB is a more advanced OR mapping project than torque. > >> > >>It will be nice to share the experience. > >> > >>Regards, > >>Slava > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
