doh, sorry. s/commons-logging/commons-validator > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Lybarger > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:11 AM > To: 'Turbine Users List' (E-mail) > Subject: commons-logging with turbine > > > We're interested in using commons-logging flexability with > our turbine applications. We're currently using intake for > validating our form information, but need more robust > validation (cross field validations, etc). Is the validator > easily swapable? Is there documentation/experience out there > of easily using the commons-validator (or a derivitive) with > turbine? Our velocity templates would also need to easily > identify if a particular field is valid or not... thoughts? > suggestions? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
