"Mark Lybarger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I admit that I've looked at the validator some time ago and then it
looked to me like one big kludge. I don't know whether this has
changed (this was long before the first validator release) but the
fact that it seems to have been a part of Struts suggests, that it
should be stable and proven.
I don't know if someone has already combined commons-validator and
Turbine but I would be interested in code examples.
Regards
Henning
>doh, sorry. s/commons-logging/commons-validator
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Lybarger
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:11 AM
>> To: 'Turbine Users List' (E-mail)
>> Subject: commons-logging with turbine
>>
>>
>> We're interested in using commons-logging flexability with
>> our turbine applications. We're currently using intake for
>> validating our form information, but need more robust
>> validation (cross field validations, etc). Is the validator
>> easily swapable? Is there documentation/experience out there
>> of easily using the commons-validator (or a derivitive) with
>> turbine? Our velocity templates would also need to easily
>> identify if a particular field is valid or not... thoughts?
>> suggestions?
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
deserves to be on this list of the top five problems."
-- Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
Open Source Software Development"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
