Re: [PATCH] Postgresql (long)

[Sean Legassick]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 03:47:41PM -0700, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> I understand that, and am saying that it's yucky when every adapter must 
> stub out a method that is a workaround for or applies to only one
> database. 

They don't have to - DB is an abstract class not an interface now, so DB
can implement the "normal" behaviour, and the adaptor for the database
that needs the workaround can implement the "weird" behaviour. No other
adaptor class needs to be affected.

-- 
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]