I'm in agreement with Daniel on both points:
+1 on all om/peer classes living in same package
-1 on violating the file structure/package structure symmetry
Sean
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 01:45:09PM -0800, John McNally wrote:
> It has bugged me for some time that the om and peer objects are in
> different packages. There are places where it would make much more
> sense to make an attribute or method package friendly or protected and
> we cannot do so because these closely related classes are in separate
> packages largely for source file organization. I am pretty sure no one
> would agree that is a good way to use packages, so is there some other
> benefit that anyone sees to this arrangement?
>
> In the latest torque version, I have moved the BaseXXX classes to a
> .base subpackage again as a way to keep them out of the way, when I did
> this I put the BaseXXX and BaseXXXPeer classes all in the same package.
> But the movement into the .base package still does not allow the use of
> package friendly methods. Because the non Base classes are not in the
> package.
>
> I would really like all these files to be in the same package as I think
> it is the most correct. However for a large database schema it will
> lead to a lot of classes in one package. Any disagreements to using one
> package?
>
> The other thing I would like some comment on is the reservations people
> would have to violating the file hierarchy/package structure symmetry
> that is generally followed in java src trees. If we put all the om/peer
> objects in one package but still present the source files as
>
> om/
> om/peer
> om/base
> om/base/peer
>
> would this cause any problems or criticism?
>
> John McNally
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Soy un hombre: nada humano me es extrano
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
