Sean Legassick wrote:
>
> I'm in agreement with Daniel on both points:
>
> +1 on all om/peer classes living in same package
>
> -1 on violating the file structure/package structure symmetry
I agree with both points. My conclusion is - shove all the
classes into .om package. The source files sitting in a
single directory won't be that hard to nagivgate, and the
increased encapsulation will allow for much nicer design.
Rafal
--
Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]