Sean Legassick wrote:
> 
> I'm in agreement with Daniel on both points:
> 
> +1 on all om/peer classes living in same package
> 
> -1 on violating the file structure/package structure symmetry

I agree with both points. My conclusion is - shove all the
classes into .om package. The source files sitting in a
single directory won't be that hard to nagivgate, and the
increased encapsulation will allow for much nicer design.

Rafal

--
Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to