Hi, because of the warnings the webhelpers-module issues, I got aware of the two different implementations.
My colleague started using url_for, and prefers it because it will deal properly with relative urls - which is a great thing, as this makes controllers re-locatable. So my question is - is there any reason why tg.url is not based on url_for, and if not, shall I come forth with an implementation? We also miss a way to stuff things into the template context. The oldturbogears.view.variable_provider mechanism doesn't work anymore, and currently only monkeypatching would help. Shall I implement a similar method as in TG1 into TG2? Diez --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
