On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > because of the warnings the webhelpers-module issues, I got aware of > the two different implementations. > > My colleague started using url_for, and prefers it because it will deal > properly with relative urls - which is a great thing, as this makes > controllers re-locatable. > > So my question is - is there any reason why tg.url is not based on url_for, > and if not, shall I come forth with an implementation?
In tg2, there is no reason not to base url on url_for now that Routes 2 is out. In fact, I've been thinking about needing to switch this eventually, but it's not happened yet. So, yea, feel free to make the change in TG2. --Mark --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
