+1 to that. On Apr 19, 11:11 am, Alessandro Molina <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 19.04.2013 03:46, schrieb Michael Pedersen: > > > Does anybody have issues with this? Is it a bad idea, or one whose > >> time has come? What do you all think? > > > The docs repository is an order of magnitude larger, and if docs would > > really be maintained as desirable, they would be even larger. So it makes > > some sense that they are separate. Makes cloning and searching in the code > > repositories much faster. I'm fine with the separate repositories, and if > > documented properly, it's not confusing. > > I see some advantages in merging TurboGears and tg.devtools repositories, > but I agree that the docs should probably be a separate repository. > As I would like to permanently keep the doc on rtfd.org, having the docs > separated wouldn't actually cause any bad to the release management > process. It should be something rtfd takes care of for us.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
