Hello

So yea me here back from the death here.

The original intent of having a separate repository (package actually) was
that you could have a runnable version of the code (tg) while having an
extensions and all the things to develop tg (tg.devtools) in a separate
package. In a nutshell the idea was to keep a core for TG thin with just
what was needed to run it in production.

Not giving an opinion here just a fact that may have been forgotten.



On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Michael Pedersen <[email protected]>wrote:

> Okay, merging the devtools and tg2 repo would be very desirable at least.
> Leaving the docs separate, and on rtfd.org, means that the release
> process needs to change, but then again, that already needed to happen with
> any merge.
>
> One consideration I'd like to toss in before I agree with the "merge tg2
> and tg2devtools but not tg2docs": Every repo gets tagged when a release is
> made. A big reason for the merge is to reduce the number of tags that has
> to be done, and thereby reduce errors.
>
> Is everybody okay with simply not having tags in the tg2docs repository?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Mengu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 to that.
>>
>> On Apr 19, 11:11 am, Alessandro Molina <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > Am 19.04.2013 03:46, schrieb Michael Pedersen:
>> >
>> > > Does anybody have issues with this? Is it a bad idea, or one whose
>> > >> time has come? What do you all think?
>> >
>> > > The docs repository is an order of magnitude larger, and if docs would
>> > > really be maintained as desirable, they would be even larger. So it
>> makes
>> > > some sense that they are separate. Makes cloning and searching in the
>> code
>> > > repositories much faster. I'm fine with the separate repositories,
>> and if
>> > > documented properly, it's not confusing.
>> >
>> > I see some advantages in merging TurboGears and tg.devtools
>> repositories,
>> > but I agree that the docs should probably be a separate repository.
>> > As I would like to permanently keep the doc on rtfd.org, having the
>> docs
>> > separated wouldn't actually cause any bad to the release management
>> > process. It should be something rtfd takes care of for us.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TurboGears Trunk" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Michael J. Pedersen
> My Online Resume: http://www.icelus.org/ -- Google+
> http://plus.ly/pedersen
> Google Talk: [email protected] -- Twitter: pedersentg
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TurboGears Trunk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to