Kevin Dangoor wrote: > TG 0.9 no longer raises an exception if there are extra parameters. I > would think that if a parameter is required, that *is* an error of > some kind. Error handling is dramatically improved in 0.9/1.0. (BTW, > the decoding filter is on by default in 0.9.) > > Is the problem the error message that's displayed? Those are > exceptional conditions and it seems like *some* error should be shown. >
Yes, the issue is simply the generic error message - I'd prefer the developer gets an error message telling them they are missing x, y, and z parameters. It sounds like this is much better now in the 0.9/1.0 line. I've really been holding off on moving up until the new code is no longer alpha, but it sounds like for all practical purposes it is something I could safely upgrade to. Thanks! Jeff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
