Bruce Eckel's recent blog posting made an excellent point... TurboGears is a model/view/controller-based framework, and we have conveniently named "model" and "controllers" files. The view for a given request is really represented by the @expose decorator. The name expose is a CherryPy carryover, but turbogears.expose is nothing like cherrypy.expose.
I'm interested in taking up Bruce's suggestion of naming the decorator @view. @expose will continue to work, and I'm not even proposing a real deprecation of @expose at this time (that would come later on). I'm suggesting that we make @view available and start using it in docs and whatnot. Thoughts? Kevin -- Kevin Dangoor TurboGears / Zesty News email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] company: http://www.BlazingThings.com blog: http://www.BlueSkyOnMars.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
