Jorge Godoy wrote: > "Nicky Ayoub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I would like to chime in... I agree with Lee and Fred. > > @expose makes more sense in my mind. I also agree with Lee > > that a change from 'template' to 'view' would truly accomplish the goal. > > I can expose methods through the web server without really presenting > > a 'view' at all, but if I use a template then I really want to see something > > out the other end. That's more intuitive and follows my thought process more > > closely. > > If it's not too late to vote, then -10 on @view and +100 on 'template' > > changing > > to 'view' as an argument of @expose... Opps, is it OK to vote more than > > once??? > > Nicky > > I also like more of this change (template for view and keeping @expose). So I > change my vote. ;-) >
+1 makes *a lot* of sense (along with a views subpackge containing json.py and the templates package): @expose(view="templates.list") @expose(view="json") in this way we could also link automatically the view parameter to the view package. Ciao Michele --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
