Jorge Vargas wrote: > On 11/2/06, Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Jonathan LaCour wrote: > > > > > Just an FYI... > > > > > > I am in active discussions with the authors of TurboEntity, and another > > > as yet unannounced declarative layer for SQLAlchemy. We are planning > > > on working together to create a single, unified declarative layer for > > > SQLAlchemy. At some point down the road, it will likely take the place > > > of both TurboEntity at ActiveMapper... > > > > As such a layer is essential for turbogears, this should become a full > > subproject. > > > I don't agree this should be incorporated at the SA layer and have > absolutely no ties to TG, other then us using it. > > > Both, sqlalchemy and TurboGears would be a possible host for such a > > sub-project (e.g. own SVN and Trac Instance, later an discussion-list). > activemapper is already at sa tree about then new project that's their > decision > > > Personally I would like to see that such a layer would be kept Object > > Oriented and would follow python/OO terminology instead of SQL > > terminology: > please take your time to review the already written code instead of > theorizing about it. because this is already there.
Of course it's not ther (especially Object Orientation). And seeing the reply-behaviour within this project I think I understand why. . --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
