On Mar 4, 2:12 am, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It does require your server to have a lot more of resources, depending on how
> many simultaneous clients are you willing to support.
More resources than what? polling? I thought Comet was *more*
efficient than polling.
> Remember that if you can have 100 simultaneous connections you will be able to
> support 100 clients only because they won't be disconnecting from the server.
>
> I prefer an event driven approach instead of comet. That with regular polls
> perform much better to my use cases.
But Comet *can* and *should* use an event driven server. Otherwise,
you'd need a separate long running thread for each client. Perhaps
I'm not clear what you mean by event driven+polling.
Chris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
