Hello guys! I'm working on the development of Transifex[1] as my application[2] for the GSoC 2008 and I'm very undecided about the subject cited. We've been migrating Transifex to use SQLAlchemy, Genshi with i18n support and ToscaWidgets on TG1.0. All seems to work fine until now. That was a part of my GSoC application. However, continuing implementing new features for Transifex on TG1.0 is not trivial. Specially as we are not using default components like SQLObject, kid template and the own TG1.0 widgets. So, as we already on a big change/migration of components, maybe we could think seriously in a TG2 migration. It could avoid another big change/migration later.
Also, another interesting point for us it's implementing too many Ajax features on our tool. That seems to be a promise feature in TG2. Implementing it on the current version of Transifex is not an easy thing to do. To be honest, I don't know if that worth. My intend is to follow the tendency, but knowing how much safe it is right now. So, I would like to ear some TG hackers about it. Please, could you give me your opinion? How much unstable TG2 is for be used in Trasifex? Do we should move to TG2? No? Why not? Any thought about Ajax? If you prefer, comment it at my blog post[3]. [1] http://transifex.org [2] http://transifex.org/wiki/gsoc/usability_enhancements [3] http://diegobz.net/2008/07/10/sqlalchemy-and-genshi-on-tg10-or-tg2/ Best regards. -- Diego Búrigo Zacarão Linux User #402589 USE SOFTWARE LIVRE --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
