I've been following the development of TG2 for quite a while now and it sounds like it's starting to stabilize. There are already some production apps on top of it if that means anything. That said, for what you're describing: SA, Genshi and TW, the differences between the two should be negligable. The real differences show up in the web server implementation and url dispatching and the like...
As for AJAX, flexible url design can make that a lot easier (TG2 wins hands down), but otherwise this is client-side activity and should be independent of the web framework you've chosen -- it should have more to do w/ your choice of javascript libraries (though some frameworks -- I'm looking at you TG1 -- are less than agnostic about js library). FWIW I've found jQuery to be infinitely more comprehensible than MochiKit. My apps are all AJAX heavy and are built in TG1 w/ SA, Genshi and TW, so my transition, when it does come, should be straitforward. On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Diego Búrigo Zacarão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello guys! > > I'm working on the development of Transifex[1] as my application[2] for the > GSoC 2008 and I'm very undecided about the subject cited. > We've been migrating Transifex to use SQLAlchemy, Genshi with i18n support > and ToscaWidgets on TG1.0. All seems to work fine until now. That was a part > of my GSoC application. > However, continuing implementing new features for Transifex on TG1.0 is not > trivial. Specially as we are not using default components like SQLObject, > kid template and the own TG1.0 widgets. So, as we already on a big > change/migration of components, maybe we could think seriously in a TG2 > migration. It could avoid another big change/migration later. > > Also, another interesting point for us it's implementing too many Ajax > features on our tool. That seems to be a promise feature in TG2. > Implementing it on the current version of Transifex is not an easy thing to > do. To be honest, I don't know if that worth. > > My intend is to follow the tendency, but knowing how much safe it is right > now. > > So, I would like to ear some TG hackers about it. Please, could you give me > your opinion? > How much unstable TG2 is for be used in Trasifex? > Do we should move to TG2? No? Why not? > Any thought about Ajax? > > If you prefer, comment it at my blog post[3]. > > [1] http://transifex.org > [2] http://transifex.org/wiki/gsoc/usability_enhancements > [3] http://diegobz.net/2008/07/10/sqlalchemy-and-genshi-on-tg10-or-tg2/ > > Best regards. > > -- > Diego Búrigo Zacarão > Linux User #402589 > USE SOFTWARE LIVRE > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
