On Jan 15, 10:29 pm, Jorge Vargas <[email protected]> wrote: > no, almost everyone is using SA. core and not-core, the only people > still using SO are > - total newbies that don't know better and just quickstarted 1.0.x > - people that don 't post to the list for help > - people that don't post tickets to solve issues > - you :)
Actually I still use it and I post to this list a lot. I don't post sqlobject questions here because: a) I pretty much finally understand it, even the parts that aren't documented. :) b) The type of questions that trip me up now are the sort of things that pretty much only Oleg knows the answer to---so they have to be asked on the sqlobject list. c) In general one tends to get better answers on the sqlobject list--- which makes sense. I've gone ahead and used SQLAlchemy in parts of my project that were pretty well confined in their own little worlds after it became clear that SQLAlchemy is the future. I've also now used it twice in small (non-TurboGears) projects. So I have an understanding of SQLAlchemy, although I'm still more comfortable with SQLObject. Believe me, Mark is right. Converting my application would take at least a man month, maybe longer. In the case of my application, I suspect that converting from cherrypy to pylons will be simple. It would probably take a day or two. But that's for my application, everyone's will be different. (I already converted from Kid to Genshi a long time ago). But hey, if somone thinks they can convert sqlObject to sqlAlchemy in a day, maybe I can hire them as a consultant to do it for me? :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
