DRC - thanks for putting all this together, by the way. I'm a big fan.
Unrelated, I gave up on trying to compile the turbovnc viewer from source
(my linux distro is too weird) and I got up and running off your
precompiled rpm that I pried apart. You're right - the performance is a
staggering improvement over TigerVNC even with the java dependency!
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:34 PM, DRC <[email protected]>
wrote:
> The Windows viewer has a pure C++ version, but other platforms require
> Java at the moment. Why is that a limitation? It's as fast as our
> native viewer and considerably faster than TigerVNC's native viewer on
> Mac platforms. I am looking at a cross-platform native viewer in the
> long term, probably based on our Windows code but ported to some
> cross-platform toolkit like GTK. For now, however, Mac and Linux
> require Java.
>
> On 3/17/17 6:22 PM, Steve Volumetric wrote:
> > I'm hoping the viewer isn't completely java dependent, though so far
> > that's the only way I've been able to build it.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> TurboVNC-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/turbovnc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
TurboVNC-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/turbovnc-users
