On 05/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought that a ComponentType would need to know the composite it lives in, to reflect interfaces, or use complex data types for properties, which are currently packaged with a composite.
But in the model Composite is a subclass of ComponentType and you say a ComponentType "lives in" a Composite? If so I think the model is wrong. Do we need a review of the model. I have to say I haven't looked into it in detail ... as it worked ;-) Cheers, -- Pete
