That looks good. I think Andy was going to generate/zip/sign/publish the packages for the distros. I tried Python 2.5 on Windows but had to go down to 2.4 so we'll stick there!
Cheers, On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote: > Sounds about right. I need to add Ruby and Python extensions into the > windows command line build. Hopefully this will be done today. > > Cheers, > > > On 09/10/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Just a quick one to find out where we are with items for C++ M2 RC1. >> From recent commits I think the status is: >> >> SDO >> - Stdcxx as a build option on Linux and Windows - done, aside from >> Linux support, probably not going to include Linux support >> - Support for an identified level of the SDO spec (2.01) - readme >> updated, but needs checking >> >> SCA >> - CPP, WS, Python, Ruby builds in source & binary release - Linux: >> done. Windows: CPP & WS done, Python & Ruby to do >> - Support for an identified level of the SCA assembly (0.96) and C++ >> C&I specs (0.95) - readme updated, but needs checking & adding to. >> >> Samples >> - Calculator, PythonCalculator, RubyCalculator, BigBank, RubyBank - >> documentation & deploy scripts done, Calculator windows build script >> done, BigBank windows build script to do. >> >> Docs >> - How to build SDO (with or without stdcxx) and SCA - done >> - How to deploy WS service/module to Axis2C - done >> - How to build/run the samples for SDO/SCA - done >> - Describe the new SCA language extensions progamming models - done >> - Release notes - updated, needs checking/adding to (see above) >> - How to turn existing C and/or C++ code into an SCA component - >> updated the "How to create a C++ component" doc - is this sufficient? >> >> Deployment >> - Simplify and open our tuscany-root folder structure to allow people >> to choose the structure that best fits their environment - done >> >> Release Requirements >> - Update Licence text in source files to the new Apache wording - done >> >> >> Does that look about right to people? Any other updates? Anything >> else to >> go in? >> >> Cheers! >> >> Andy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > Who has a complete environment to build a Linux distribution? I am able to generate a Linux distribution in the following environment: Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 (with a 2.6.9-34 kernel) Axis2c 0.94 Python 2.3.4 Ruby 1.8.1 PHP 5.1.6 httpd-2.2.3 Libxml2 2.6.20 My Python and Ruby installations are a little old, so I'll try to upgrade them to: Python 2.4.3 Ruby 1.8.5 later today... Do these levels look light to you for this release? Should we use different levels? I can help generate the distribution or just help with testing if somebody else has a better environment to build it (like a recent Fedora core for example). Let me know. Thanks. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Pete
