Meeraj, >I think it would be fairly straightforward to write a generic JMX dynamic >MBean based on introspecting the annotated members (ops, properties etc), >quite similar to the reflection one already in the source tree. I think one >key question is would these annotations be specific to tuscany, or would >they be pushed into the core SCA spec some time. If they are tuscany >specific, what are the implications on portability of service classes >across different SCA implementations? You'd hope they'd make it into the SCA spec. If not there, then at least into org.apache.ws.commons. :-)
>Also, regarding what Jeremy mentioned about CompositeComponent having a >ManagementService injected in, which in turn is defined as a system service, >do we have a 'chicken-and-egg' situation here. Currently, tuscany server >exposes the management service for remote management. Management clients >use this service to start and stop runtimes. All system services are >associated with a runtime. However, if the management service is defined as >a system service, we will have to start a runtime to make the management >service available. However to start a runtime we need a management >service :) Oh dear, this does sound grim. So the bootstrap runtime is no more? Perhaps the system service of the management service running inside the individual runtimes could be 'spun off' of an already running instance? Cheers, Joel The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
