On 3/24/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



On 3/24/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, I give up on this, and I'll try not bring this subject up anymore
> !!!


Don't give up, its important to get to the build we think is the best for
Tuscany.

I think the crux of the problem was said in the previous email - we can't
see how to make what we want work with independently versioned modules.

So are "independently versioned modules" worth it?

Given all the past threads debating this, all the confusion and trouble
users and developers have been having, and the current state of the project
and community, how about we put independently versioned modules as a TODO to
look at in the future when things are more clear and stable, and for now go
back to a single version and a project you can build from the top with mvn?


Discussion on this seems to have died down so I'm going to call a vote so we
have closure on this for the next release. I'll leave it a couple more days
to see if anything else comes up but given the whats been said i think the
vote will be along the lines of having a single version for everything in
java/sca and pom.xml that enables all that to be built from the top with
mvn.

  ...ant

Reply via email to