Ant, I've had a good poke around and built the source distro and run the tests successfully. The only potential blocking issue I have found is that absence of a STATUS file, which it was my understanding should be copied in from the project's STATUS file into every distribution, but I haven't been able to re-find that guidance in the apache site. Can anyone help clarify this please?
The rest of these comments are all minor observations that wouldn't stop me +1-ing the release. Indeed, some of them may result in clarification that what you have done is corrent and that will help SDO in future releases? I've had comments in the past that Apache like it if the names of the release file names include the "apache-" prefix I think the copyright in the NOTICES file at the top level of the source distro should include 2005 I thought that the intention of the BUILDING file was to guide a person who has downloaded the source distribution to be able to recreate the distribution files, not just to compile and test? I can't re-find the guidance on that having searched that apache site. The LICENSE file in binary distro contains CPL 1.0 twice, once for wsdl4j and then at the bottom for Jruby. It would be really helpful to include a package.html file for each package so that the javadoc gives an overview of what each package does. Cheers, Kelvin. On 20/05/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/0.90-rc1/ This includes the binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, and the Maven staging repository. The SVN tag for the release is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/0.90-incubating/ Looks ok to me so here's my +1. Thanks in advance, ...ant
