Hi,
I downloaded the 0.90 binary distro and unzipped it locally. I also
deleted
my local maven repo. Then when I follow the README in
tuscany-sca-0.90-incubating\samples\calculator to run "mvn" to build the
samples, I get the following error as appended later.
Am I not supposed to build the sample this way since it's a binary
distro?
I
can see the jar is pre-built.
Other than that, the ant script works well to run the pre-built
samples. I
think it is very nice for users to see the samples actually run in this
simple way.
Thanks,
Raymond
C:\Apache\tuscany-sca-0.90-incubating\samples\calculator>mvn
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/t
uscany/sca/tuscany-sca/0.90-incubating/tuscany-sca-0.90-incubating.pom
Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tuscany/sca/tuscany-sca/0.
90-incubating/tuscany-sca-0.90-incubating.pom
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).
Project ID: null:sample-calculator:jar:null
Reason: Cannot find parent: org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-sca for
project:
null
:sample-calculator:jar:null
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Trace
org.apache.maven.reactor.MavenExecutionException: Cannot find parent:
org.apache
.tuscany.sca:tuscany-sca for project: null:sample-calculator:jar:null
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java
:378)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:290)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:125)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:272)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
java:64)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
sorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:615)
at
org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
at
org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: Cannot find
parent
: org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-sca for project:
null:sample-calculator:jar:nul
l
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.assembleLineage(D
efaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:1264)
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildInternal(Def
aultMavenProjectBuilder.java:749)
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildFromSourceFi
leInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:479)
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.build(DefaultMave
nProjectBuilder.java:200)
at
org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProject(DefaultMaven.java:537)
at
org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.collectProjects(DefaultMaven.java:467)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java
:364)
... 11 more
Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: POM
'org.apache.tu
scany.sca:tuscany-sca' not found in repository: Unable to download the
artifact
from any repository
org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-sca:pom:0.90-incubating
from the specified remote repositories:
central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
apache.incubator
(http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
)
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.findModelFromRepo
sitory(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:573)
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.assembleLineage(D
efaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:1260)
... 17 more
Caused by: org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.ArtifactNotFoundException:
Unable
to download the artifact from any repository
org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-sca:pom:0.90-incubating
from the specified remote repositories:
central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
apache.incubator
(http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
)
at
org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolve(De
faultArtifactResolver.java:197)
at
org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolve(De
faultArtifactResolver.java:73)
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.findModelFromRepo
sitory(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:526)
... 18 more
Caused by: org.apache.maven.wagon.ResourceDoesNotExistException:
Unable to
downl
oad the artifact from any repository
at
org.apache.maven.artifact.manager.DefaultWagonManager.getArtifact(Def
aultWagonManager.java:324)
at
org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolve(De
faultArtifactResolver.java:185)
... 20 more
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 3 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Tue May 22 17:03:52 PDT 2007
[INFO] Final Memory: 2M/5M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating
> Another very detailed review, thank you! Comments in line, but to
> summarise
> - there's an unclear sample readme, a broken sample readme, and some
> missing
> Javadoc. This isn't perfect, but are any of those blockers requiring
the
> delay of another RC? I think not and its better to get this release out
> sooner than to delay and respin another RC, so my vote is still +1 on
> going
> with this RC, and we can fix those issues in the next release.
Completely
> open to other's opinions though so please say what you think.
>
> ...ant
>
> On 5/21/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Here are my findings around the 0.9 Release Candidate, my main concern
is
>> with the issues I mentioned in the modules directory of the source.
>>
>> Samples:
>> I have tried the standalone samples and the web samples (in jetty and
>> tomcat).
>> All samples look OK, with the exceptions of the ones mentioned below :
>>
>> calculator-rmi-reference - WARNING
>>
>> The README is confusing, by reading it, I was under the impression
that
>> the
>> server and client were on the same project, and it also have the
client
>> and
>> server ant xml files there. But in order to properly run the sample,
you
>> need to go to calculator-rmi-service and actually start the server
there,
>> then come to the reference (client)
>>
>> D:\temp\0.9 Release\tuscany-
>> sca-0.90-incubating\samples\calculator-rmi-reference>ant -f
>> build-server.xmlrun
>> Buildfile: build-server.xml
>>
>> run:
>> [java] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
calculator/CalculatorServer
>> [java] Exception in thread "main"
>> [java] Java Result: 1
>
>
> Looks like a cutNpaste problem between the service and client readme's,
i
> agree this makes it confusing.
>
> implementation-crud-client - ERROR
>>
>> Looks like the ant.xml property has the wrong package, I have fixed
this
>> in
>> the branch and trunk
>> after adding the right package, it works
>> <property name="test.class" value="crud.client.CRUDClient" />
>>
>> D:\temp\0.9 Release\tuscany-
>> sca-0.90-incubating\samples\implementation-crud-client>ant run
>> Buildfile: build.xml
>>
>> run:
>> [java] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: crud/CRUDClient
>> [java] Exception in thread "main"
>> [java] Java Result: 1
>
>
> Yep, this one is broken. I guess after all the last minute changes to
the
> way the extension samples were like.
>
> Source Modules
>>
>> itest\interop-soap-client -> pom version has SNAPSHOT
>> itest\interop-soap-round2-client -> pom version has SNAPSHOT
>> itest\interop-soap-service -> pom version has SNAPSHOT
>> -> reference axion snapshot
>> -> reference axion-impl snapshot
>> itest\interop-xsq-client -> pom version has SNAPSHOT
>> -> still has varios scdl files
>>
>> modules\binding-jms --> are we shipping that ? still have SCDL files
with
>> references to snapshot, wsdl also reference snapshot
>> modules\discovery-jms --> are we shipping that ? If so, it has
SNAPSHOT
>> version on it
>>
>> modules\binding-ws-xml -> test1.wsdl references snapshot
>> (<wsdlsoap:address
>> location="
>>
>>
http://localhost:8080/sample-helloworldws-1.0-SNAPSHOT/services/HelloWorldWebService
>> "
>> />)
>>
>> modules\contribution-impl -> namespace defined as NS = "
>> http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/1.0-SNAPSHOT";;
>>
>> modules\interface-wsdl-xml -> test1.wsdl andpoing references snapshot
>> (<wsdlsoap:address location="
>>
>>
http://localhost:8080/sample-helloworldws-1.0-SNAPSHOT/services/HelloWorldWebService
>> "
>> />)
>
>
> None of those are significant IMHO as either they're not included in
the
> build or the reference to snapshot is not actually used at runtime.
>
> Javadoc
>>
>> Just a subset of packages javadoc was generated, I don't see
contribution
>> javadoc available... Is this ok ?
>
>
> Another flaw, ideally we'd have Javadoc for every package we said
was an
> API
> or SPI.
>
> Binaries
>>
>> We have a dependency on JRuby release candidate
>> (jruby-complete-1.0RC2.jar
>> )
>> ? Is that ok ?
>
>
> Thats fine, its just SNAPSHOT build we shouldn't release with.
>
> On 5/21/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't think that document says we MUST include the STATUS
document.
>> > It
>> > says "Check status document" meaning check that the STATUS doc
doesn't
>> say
>> > there are outstanding legal issues that may prevent a release. Even
if
>> > that
>> > releasemanagement doc did say we must, the doc is still under
>> development
>> > and in draft state so I'm not sure its binding policy. Given other
>> recent
>> > incubator releases didn't include the STATUS doc and an IPMCer
recently
>> > said
>> > it could be removed from a distro i think this is not a blocking
issue.
>> >
>> > ...ant
>> >
>> > On 5/21/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Regarding the STATUS document, I think the policy say we must
include
>> > > them,
>> > > check [1] on the "Release Documentation" and "STATUS document"
>> sessions.
>> > > Also our STATUS file is not up to date, and I can take care of
>> > > helping
>> > > updating that after I finish reviewing the rest of the release
>> > candidate.
>> > >
>> > > [1] - http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>> > >
>> > > On 5/21/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hey many thanks for the prompt and detailed review.
>> > > >
>> > > > I can't remember exactly about the STATUS file, i think it
may be
>> > > > an
>> > old
>> > > > requirement that is no longer necessary. I can find this
>> > > incubator-general
>> > > > email [1] about the recent CXF release which included and old
and
>> > > > incorrect
>> > > > status file, and the guidance from an IPMC member was its ok to
>> > > > just
>> > > > remove
>> > > > it from the distro, so i think its fine we don't include this.
>> > > >
>> > > > All these other comments seem like good things we should do in
>> future,
>> > > if
>> > > > we
>> > > > do have to respin the 0.90 distro's for some other reason I'll
try
>> to
>> > > > incorporate some of them.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > >
>> > > > ...ant
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200705.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >
>> > > > On 5/21/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Ant,
>> > > > > I've had a good poke around and built the source distro and
run
>> > the
>> > > > > tests
>> > > > > successfully. The only potential blocking issue I have
found is
>> that
>> > > > > absence
>> > > > > of a STATUS file, which it was my understanding should be
copied
>> in
>> > > > from
>> > > > > the project's STATUS file into every distribution, but I
haven't
>> > been
>> > > > > able
>> > > > > to re-find that guidance in the apache site. Can anyone help
>> clarify
>> > > > this
>> > > > > please?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The rest of these comments are all minor observations that
>> wouldn't
>> > > stop
>> > > > > me
>> > > > > +1-ing the release. Indeed, some of them may result in
>> > clarification
>> > > > that
>> > > > > what you have done is corrent and that will help SDO in future
>> > > releases?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I've had comments in the past that Apache like it if the names
of
>> > the
>> > > > > release file names include the "apache-" prefix
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think the copyright in the NOTICES file at the top level of
the
>> > > source
>> > > > > distro should include 2005
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I thought that the intention of the BUILDING file was to guide
a
>> > > person
>> > > > > who
>> > > > > has downloaded the source distribution to be able to recreate
the
>> > > > > distribution files, not just to compile and test? I can't
>> re-find
>> > > the
>> > > > > guidance on that having searched that apache site.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The LICENSE file in binary distro contains CPL 1.0 twice,
once
>> for
>> > > > wsdl4j
>> > > > > and then at the bottom for Jruby.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > It would be really helpful to include a package.html file for
>> > > > > each
>> > > > package
>> > > > > so that the javadoc gives an overview of what each package
does.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Cheers, Kelvin.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 20/05/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of
Tuscany
>> > SCA
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > Java.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The artifacts are available for review at:
>> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/0.90-rc1/
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > This includes the binary and source distributions, the RAT
>> > reports,
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > Maven staging repository.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The SVN tag for the release is:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/0.90-incubating/
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Looks ok to me so here's my +1.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks in advance,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ...ant
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Luciano Resende
>> > > Apache Tuscany Committer
>> > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> Apache Tuscany Committer
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
