Hi Ant, I was trying to avoid the uri scheme and thought this to be a sure way to keep out errors - getting explicit inputs for each. But then, this just about manages only the defaults for host and port. So, I am open to implementing your suggestion and understand it could be more consistent with the other bindings.
Thanks - Venkat On 6/4/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I started documenting the RMI binding SCDL at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+binding.rmi I wondered if it could use a URI format instead of or as well as the separate host, port, and servicename attributes? There may be some reason its doesn't, has it ever been considered? Along the lines of whats described at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/jndi/jndi-rmi.html#RMI, so: <binding.rmi uri="rmi://localhost:1099/myservice"/> and all those could have defaults so you could just have <binding.rmi/> on a service and it would make it available using the component and service name as described in 1.7.2 of the assembly spec. ...ant
