Hi Luciano, This is a surprise :)... I was planning on taking the 0.91 brn tomorrow and imediately start getting out RCs to vote on, but I can't do that if it needs to include the DAS beta1 release???.
What do people think? - Venkat On 6/18/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, I'm having some restricted internet access as I'm traveling since last week... that's probably why we haven't created a DAS release candidate yet... but the community and I think that we are ready to have one. Yes, the idea is to have a DAS beta1 dependency on SCA 0.91 on the following items: - implementation.das - implementation.data - some samples (maybe including the samples we didn't ship in 0.9) On 6/18/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What will be the relationship between SCA 0.91 and DAS? I have seen > some discussions on the list about a DAS release. Will SCA 0.91 have > this DAS release as a dependency? > > Simon > > Luciano Resende wrote: > > > I have updated the wiki [1] page with things that I'm working on, and > > would like to have in 0.91 . > > > > As for the implementation.das question regarding it's canned derby db, > > we recently created a db utility to create and populate the database, > > and I have plans to integrate with it. > > > > [1] > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents > > > > > > On 6/16/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Wow 571 license problems! after being clean for 0.90 just a month ago. > >> > >> One question this brings up is what is actually intended to be > >> included in > >> 0.91? There's been quite a few new extensions and demo's etc added > >> recently > >> but no one has said they want those included in 0.91. Should they be by > >> default or should we just include things that are mentioned on the > >> release > >> wiki page? If so anyone else care to help clean things up, add missing > >> license headers, check the distribution works and includes > >> dependencies etc? > >> The implementation.das is including an entire database in the src, is > >> there > >> any way that could be generated by the tests? > >> > >> ...ant > >> > >> On 6/16/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Thanks Ant. So could we all please use this wiki page to put down > >> things > >> > that are going to be increments over 0.90. > >> > > >> > Also I run the RAT on the trunk - just java/sca and here is the > >> report. I > >> > intend to go and fix the missing headers just ahead of cutting the > >> branch. > >> > Before that if anybody would like to jump in and help with this, > >> please feel > >> > free do so. > >> > > >> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/RAT_0.91/RAT_0.91.txt< http://people.apache.org/%7Esvkrish/RAT_0.91/RAT_0.91.txt> > >> > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > - Venkat > >> > > >> > On 6/14/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Taking a branch around the 20th sounds ok to me. > >> > > > >> > > The high level things I'm focusing on for the 0.91 release are: > >> > > > >> > > - Simplification of using script components (working without > >> > > .componentType > >> > > side files) > >> > > - First cut of the simpler binding/implementation SPI > >> > > - clean up of ajax and jsonrpc bindings > >> > > - The EJB binding > >> > > > >> > > I'd also said to someone on the user list I'd get WS services without > >> > > wsdl > >> > > working so will try to do that as well. > >> > > > >> > > Most of the code for those is close-ish to being done, though there's > >> > > still > >> > > a whole lot of related sample work to get done. > >> > > > >> > > I'd started a wiki page for 0.91 at > >> > > > >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents > >> > >> > > > >> > > ...ant > >> > > > >> > > On 6/13/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks for the faith and encouragement. This is going to be my > >> first > >> > > > experience and I am sure of getting all the help from you folks to > >> > > pull > >> > > > this > >> > > > off successfully. > >> > > > > >> > > > So, to start with, I propose to cut a branch around June 20th, > >> > > 2007. If > >> > > > people are ok with this, then all that we'd like to be a part of > >> > > 0.91should > >> > > > get in by then (June 20th, 2007). Does that work fine with > >> everybody? > >> > > > > >> > > > Also, I'd also like to list down the significant additions / > >> > > enhancements > >> > > > over 0.90 for the Release Notes. You can state the item here on > >> this > >> > > > thread > >> > > > and I will take care of recording it. > >> > > > > >> > > > - Venkat > >> > > > > >> > > > On 6/13/07, Simon Nash < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > +1 from me too. I'm sure Venkat will do a fine job. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Simon > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Simon Laws wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> Yeah, Venkat did loads on the last release. +1 from me for > >> Venkat > >> > > as > >> > > > > >> 0.91 RM > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> Simon > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > +1 from me > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
