The SDO HEAD will contain the ongoing development for the 2.1 spec changes. The branch was created to maintain a stable version as some of the spec changes will cause instability.
I think ongoing development should continue in HEAD so we do not need an SCA branch. We just need to ensure that SCA HEAD will compile/run against SDO HEAD. What do you think? Cheers, On 13/07/07, Brady Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all, I understand there is an SDO branch created for the SDO 2.1 spec compliance changes. The SCA code also needs changes made for the SDO changes, so can we just make an SCA branch where those changes can be made. -------------------- Brady Johnson Lead Software Developer - HydraSCA Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Pete --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
