On 8/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simon Laws wrote: > > On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that > the > >> published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not in syc or > >> not > >> the latest?? I can not think of other possibilities. > >> > >> Vamsi > >> > >> > >> On 8/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On 8/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 8/11/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> We put together a demo [1] on Tuscany/Geronimo integration for the > >>>>> LinuxWorld 2007. You are welcome to play with it and give us > >>>>> > >> feedback. > >> > >>>>> Please follow the instructions at > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/README.TXT > >> > >>>>> . > >>>>> The demo scenario is captured at > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/scenario.png > >> > >>>>> . > >>>>> > >>>>> The demo is built on top of the sandbox code in Geronimo [2] which > >>>>> > >> is > >> > >>>>> discussed on [3]. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please note this is just the starting of effort and there are still > >>>>> > >>>> quite > >>>> > >>>>> a > >>>>> lot to do. Please join us on this effort. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the near term, I believe that we need to do the following: > >>>>> > >>>>> 1) Move the code out of sandbox and have them in the build with test > >>>>> cases. > >>>>> 2) The tuscany-geronimo-plugin uses mixed versions of Tuscany Java > >>>>> > >> SCA > >> > >>>>> 0.91-incubating and 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT. Let's try to switch to > >>>>> 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT so that we have consistent modules. > >>>>> > >>>> After switching to 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, I have run into a > >>>> NoClassDefFoundError: > >>>> org/apache/tuscany/sca/assembly/DefaultSCABindingFactory. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 3) The Geronimo 2.0 RC1 is not being voted on. We should be prepared > >>>> > >> to > >> > >>>> move > >>>> > >>>>> this level. Vamsi, do you have the JIRA GERONIMO-3351 [4] fixed in > >>>>> > >> the > >> > >>>>> RC1? > >>>>> > >>>> GERONIMO-3351 has not been integrated into 2.0 release. Part of the > >>>> problem > >>>> is addressed in branches\2.0 and trunk. It affects only SNAPSHOT > >>>> dependencies and there is some discussion on whether the downloaded > >>>> version > >>>> (if it is different from SNAPSHOT) should be renamed, by the plugin > >>>> installer, to SNAPSHOT or the dependency resolution is Geronimo > should > >>>> handle it in a different way. The problem we have run into is in > >>>> conjunction with another problem that occurs when a trailing "/" is > >>>> > >> not > >> > >>>> present in the maven repo URL. This has been fixed in branches\2.0 > >>>> > >> and > >> > >>>> trunk (not in 2.0 release though) and the work around for this is to > >>>> > >> put > >> > >>>> that trailing "/" in the maven repo URLs in geronimo-plugin.xml > >>>> > >> . These > >> > >>>> two > >>>> fixes will (most likely, but not guaranteed) go into 2.0.1 due to be > >>>> released soon (probably this week). > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [1] > >>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/ > >> > >>>>> [2] > >>>>> > >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/tuscany-integration/ > >>>> > >>>>> [3] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+Geronimo+Integration > >> > >>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3351 > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Raymond > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> org/apache/tuscany/sca/assembly/DefaultSCABindingFactory. was taken > out > >>> > >> a > >> > >>> week or so ago when I moved the majority of sca binding into the > >>> binding-sca > >>> module. I'm thinking that I was a little overzealous when I took this > >>> > >> out > >> > >>> and that it probably needs to go back in. In the mean time can you > >>> > >> create > >> > >>> a > >>> > >>> > >>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.sca.impl.SCABindingFactoryImpl > >>> > >>> instead? > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> Simon > >>> > >>> > > You may very well be right. Time to push some new snapshots out! Let me > find > > out how to do that. > > > > Simon > > > > > > Yes I think that new published snapshots will resolve that issue. > > In addition, how about adding the Tuscany/Geronimo integration modules > to our build? This will help us check that we're not breaking them when > we make changes in the rest of the Tuscany code. It will also make it > easier for people to try out the integration from their Tuscany > workspace / development environment. > > The simplest is probably to point to these modules in the Geronimo > sandbox SVN from our java/sca/modules directory using an SVN externals > property... > > Thoughts? > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ok, I've published a new set of snapshots for the SCA modules (I haven't done samples or itests). I tested against the current SDO snapshots. Let us know if this gets you any further forward.
Regards Simon
