On 8/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/9/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > <snip> > > - Post 0.95, maybe a couple of weeks after the release, we'd cut > > another branch and head with that for 1.0 release. Being a 1.0 > > release, we prob. need a branch early as that so that we can whet the > > things we are targetting for the release. > > > This seems like a really good idea to me. The 0.99 release has again shown > that it always takes at least a couple of RCs to discover and resolve > regressions caused by last minute changes and to polish up the samples, > and > for 1.0 we're all likely to be a bit more pedantic about readme and sample > problems. How about aiming for a 1.0 branch and RC1 around the 14th of > September? That gives 3 weeks from now for getting things ready and then > two > weeks which should enough for 2 or 3 RCs and voting and still get a 1.0 in > September. > > I've created a 1.0 JIRA version and started moving into there JIRAs i'd > like > to try to get done for 1.0 : > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312698 > > > One thing that would be good to do now while they're fresh in our minds is > for people to commit fixes to trunk for all the sample and readme issues > they reported in the 0.99 review so they don't get forgotten till > 1.0review. > > ...ant > +1 from me. I think we are going to need the extra time to fix the many small things we found this time round.
Simon
