On 8/31/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The operation.getInput() cannot be null to qualify for the wrapper style.
> There must be a part in the input message corresponding to the operation
> name:
>
> input
> --- message
> --- part (only one part)
> --- element (the element name should be the same as the
> operation name)
>
> The element should look like this:
>
> <element name="myMethod">
> <complexType>
> <sequence/> <!-- an empty sequence -->
> </complexType>
> </element>
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "tuscany-dev" <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:34 AM
> Subject: Wrapper style test in WSDL processing?
>
>
> > There is a test to determine whether a WSDL operation follows the
> > "wrapped"
> > style in accordance with JAX-WS 2.0 spec. See
> > WSDLOperationIntrospectorImpl
> > (
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/interface-wsdl/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/interfacedef/wsdl/impl/WSDLOperationIntrospectorImpl.java
> > )
> >
> > The code is currently
> >
> > public boolean isWrapperStyle() throws InvalidWSDLException {
> > if (wrapperStyle == null) {
> > wrapperStyle =
> > wrapper.getInputChildElements() != null && (
> > operation.getOutput() == null || wrapper
> > .getOutputChildElements() != null);
> > }
> > return wrapperStyle;
> > }
> >
> > Which doesn't seem to cater for the case where there may be no input
> > parameters. I'm diving into this code now to see if I can work out what
> it
> > means but if anyone has any insight I would appreciate it.
> >
> > Needless to say I have a scenario where I am trying to auto generate
> WSDL
> > for a method with the signature
> >
> > String myMethod()
> >
> > And it's complaining that it's not wrapped.
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What you are saying sounds right to me, I.e. you can validly have no
parameters in your method but in this case it should build an empty sequence
<element name="myMethod">
<complexType>
<sequence/> <!-- an empty sequence -->
</complexType>
</element>
And have this as the single input type. I'm deeper into the code now looking
for why this isn't the case.
Thanks Raymond
Simon
