The upgrade process is very harmless, two line of code, one for the js reference and another for the reference declaration. Also, seems like there are some bugs on the scaDomain.js [1] that would not happen while using the manual reference. I also think that, having the two very similar bindings will make confusion and other maintenance headaches. Have said that, and as I'm working towards getting the web2.0 References working soon, I'd like to keep this as one binding, but I'm open if the community feels otherwise.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1820 On 10/22/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about changing this to be a completely separate new binding? That way > we'll be able to keep backward compatibility - new users can use the new > extension but people already using binding.jsonrpc from the 1.0 release can > continue to use the old json-rpc-java based extension till they're ready to > upgrade. > > ...ant > > On 10/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have just committed some enhancements to JSONRPC binding. It should > > now be able to work with the Tuscany Databinding framework (I > > particulary tested with SDO). I have also added initial code to > > support References for the JSONRPC Binding, although this is not > > completely finished yet. > > > > Note that the current implementation still uses the JSONRPCBridge to > > handle "system.*" calls, and I was wondering if anyone have some > > references on this calls, and whether or not it's a must to support > > them. > > > > Support for SCADomain.js is disabled, as I'm starting to work on > > support for references on a web2.0 client application similar to what > > was discussed/proposed on this thread[1]. I have modified the > > helloworld-jsonrpc to use a local jsonrpc.js. > > > > Please, let me know if you guys see any problems. > > > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg23094.html > > > > On 10/10/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > To the specific question, the store sample is shipping the JSONRPC > > > proxy probably because the SCADomain.js does not have support for > > > components with multiple services as reported in [1]. > > > > > > As for a more broad number of enhancements around JSONRPC, I have > > > started to add support for Databindings [2], References and working on > > > moving to support references on a web2.0 application similar to what > > > was discussed/proposed on this thread [3]. > > > > > > I should have some of this done early next week, after I fix couple > > > issues that I'm seeing in my local environment. > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1820 > > > [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg24367.html > > > [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg23094.html > > > > > > On 10/10/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/10/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > What do you mean by "the proxy that is automatically generated" ? > > > > > > > > > > On 10/10/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Currently the store sample ships a JSONRPC proxy ( > > binding-jsonrpc.js) as > > > > > an > > > > > > alternative to the proxy that is automatically generated. Why is > > this > > > > > the > > > > > > case? > > > > > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > As in the proxy that is automatically generated and that you would > > find at > > > > > > > > > > > > http://yourhost:yourport/yourapp/SCADomain/scaDomain.js > > > > > > > > Am assuming here that this feature still works. > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
