I have just committed some enhancements to JSONRPC binding. It should now be able to work with the Tuscany Databinding framework (I particulary tested with SDO). I have also added initial code to support References for the JSONRPC Binding, although this is not completely finished yet.
Note that the current implementation still uses the JSONRPCBridge to handle "system.*" calls, and I was wondering if anyone have some references on this calls, and whether or not it's a must to support them. Support for SCADomain.js is disabled, as I'm starting to work on support for references on a web2.0 client application similar to what was discussed/proposed on this thread[1]. I have modified the helloworld-jsonrpc to use a local jsonrpc.js. Please, let me know if you guys see any problems. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg23094.html On 10/10/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To the specific question, the store sample is shipping the JSONRPC > proxy probably because the SCADomain.js does not have support for > components with multiple services as reported in [1]. > > As for a more broad number of enhancements around JSONRPC, I have > started to add support for Databindings [2], References and working on > moving to support references on a web2.0 application similar to what > was discussed/proposed on this thread [3]. > > I should have some of this done early next week, after I fix couple > issues that I'm seeing in my local environment. > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1820 > [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg24367.html > [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg23094.html > > On 10/10/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/10/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > What do you mean by "the proxy that is automatically generated" ? > > > > > > On 10/10/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Currently the store sample ships a JSONRPC proxy (binding-jsonrpc.js) as > > > an > > > > alternative to the proxy that is automatically generated. Why is this > > > the > > > > case? > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > As in the proxy that is automatically generated and that you would find at > > > > > > http://yourhost:yourport/yourapp/SCADomain/scaDomain.js > > > > Am assuming here that this feature still works. > > > > Simon > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany Committer > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
