On Nov 13, 2007 5:30 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote: > > On Nov 13, 2007 4:04 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> [snip] > >> Simon Laws wrote: > >> > >>> Now that 1.0.1 is well on the way I'd like to suggest that we start to > >>> > >>> think about our next feature release (1.1). > >>> > >> +1 > >> > >> > >>> We need to decide what we want in and when we want to get the release > >>> > >> out. > >> > >> Aside from the roadmap page, is there already a list with what people > >> would like to see in? > >> > > > > The only list is the roadmap page as far as I'm aware. > > > > > > OK, I have a few comments and questions. > > From earlier in this thread: > - transaction is to be in 1.1 > - will reliability be in 1.1 too? Do you mean in term's of being able to bring nodes up and down and the implications for ongoing processing. If so - not sure were going to have time fo this. > > - binding.jms is to be in 1.1 > - will the JMS support include host-jms? > - distro (modularization) improvements > > Some questions > - Support for domain in all the hosting options... what options does > that include? I think we can do standalone, and http. Not sure about rmi or any others we choose to add, e.g. jms > > - Is anybody working on domain management support with wsdm, jmx etc? I started looking a muse a little bit but haven't got anything concrete yet. > > - Is anybody working on the Geronimo integration? has there been talks > about including it in a Geronimo release? > > Two suggestions, as the number of items flagged as "to be in 1.1" > already scares me :) And me. The markers on the roadmap page are purely my invention based on what I have seen on the ML. Lets cut out what we don't think we can deliver. > > - How about starting to assign some of the open JIRAs to the SCA 1.1 > release? +1 a good idea. Can people put the JIRA number back into the roadmap in the first instance. Not planning on maintaining that but I want to understand the mapping. > > - The list is a mix of small / almost done and huge implementation > tasks. I think it'll help to flag them as such, and say whether people > are actually working on them or not. > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
