Simon, +1 to have consistency.
Shorter is better. Yours, Mike. Simon Nash wrote:
The following method names in domain-api and node-api include a reference to either a domain or a node: SCADomain.addToDomainLevelComposite() SCADomain.removeFromDomainLevelComposite() SCADomain.getDomainLevelComposite() SCADomainFactory.createSCADomain() SCADomainFinder.getSCADomain() SCANode.getDomain() SCANode.addToDomainLevelComposite() SCANodeFactory.createSCANode() SCANodeFactory.createNodeWithComposite() Of these 9 method names, 3 of them refer to "SCADomain" or "SCANode" and 6 of them refer to plain "Domain" or "Node". I would like to remove the "SCA" from the 3 method names that include it. Since the SCADomain* and SCANode* class names already include "SCA" to disambiguate them from other kinds of node and domain, I don't think there is a need to repeat the "SCA" in the method names as well. What do others think about this? Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]