Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
I think there are two options:
1) Make the JAXB databinding as the default databinding for POJOs
(simple and complex types).
What about doing that? any drawback?
And, jumping ahead and assuming that any drawbacks are acceptable, what
about using that as well instead of where we currently use Java
serialization to achieve "pass by value" through remotable interfaces.
That'll allow us to remove the requirement for objects that flow through
a remotable interface to implement java.io.Serializable, which is not
quite right.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
