On Jan 2, 2008 7:04 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip] > Simon Laws wrote: > > > > Looking at what we have at the moment the main issue I'm having is with > > Saxon. implementation-bpel depends on 8.7 and other parts of Tuscany, > e.g. > > xml-bigbank, have a dependency on 9.0.0.2. I tried bringing > > implementation-bpel up to 9.0.0.2 with no luck. Is there someone who has > > been working on these areas that can advise how we can rationalize. > > > > The result at the moment is that we end up with a mixed set of jar > versions > > added to the distribution and hence some of the samples/demos can't find > the > > jars they require. I can't determine exactly how the jars are chosen. It > > could be the first or last module to specify a dependency or something > else > > as we get some jars at 8.7 and some at 9.0.0.2. Can someone tell me how > the > > distribution build chooses which jar version to ship. > > > > Thanks > > > > Simon > > > > The ODE runtime used by Tuscany's implementation-bpel is built with > saxon 8.7 (look for saxon in [1]). > > In Tuscany v1.0.1 implementation-xquery and databinding-saxon worked > with saxon 8.7. > > I'd suggest to try saxon 8.7, implementation-xquery from trunk or > v1.0.1, databinding-saxon from Tuscany v1.0.1. > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ode/trunk/Rakefile > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > OK, thanks for the reply Sebastien. Sounds like I need to mess about with the databinding-saxon version one I've taken the branch Simon
