How about something like DataPassingStyle or DataPassingStrategy?
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r628163 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca:
itest/interfaces/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/interfaces/
itest/interfaces/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/interfaces/
modules/binding-ejb/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/s
Raymond Feng wrote:
My preference is to keep PassByValue as the prefix for the following
reasons.
1) The invokers implement this interface only for the cases to enforece
pass-by-value for remotable interfaces. Invocations over local interfaces
(pass-by-reference) don't even care about this flag.
2) The allowsPassByReference() method basically tells if it's safe to
pass data as-is without violating the pass-by-value semantics.
Having a SomethingPassByValue interface provide an allowsPassByReference
method is really confusing IMHO.
I think we should use a consistent terminology with either passByValue or
passByReference but not a mix of both.
Initially, I was thinking about PassByValueInvoker but I found it a bit
misleading as it doesn't extend from the Invoker interface.
OK, let's scratch Invoker. I'm OK with xyzAware instead of xyzInvoker.
Just my 2c.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
