Re: svn commit: r628163 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca: itest/interfaces/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/interfaces/ itest/interfaces/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/interfaces/ modules/binding-ejb/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/s

[Jean-Sebastien Delfino]

Raymond Feng wrote:
How about something like DataPassingStyle or DataPassingStrategy?

This is not a big issue and I would not seriously -1 any name even if 
you just called it the XyzStyle but I'd like to understand why we'd use 
a different term from the term used in the spec, and if we did, how we 
would explain to our users:

(a) why we used a different term for the same concept

or (b) if it's actually a different concept, how different it is from 
what's described in the spec, why we needed that new concept, and how it 
maps to the concept from the spec.

--
Jean-Sebastien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]