It is strange. Removing the <includes> at the bottom of the assembly bin.xml changes it so that the dependencies do get included again, but several felix dependencies also get dragged in. What is the complete list of jars that should be included?
...ant On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:02 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This failure also occurs with the 2.1 version and the 2.2-beta-1 version. > The current trunk version is 2.2-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, which I haven't found in > a repository yet, so the only version that seems ever to have worked is > the > 2.2-SNAPSHOT version. I have taken a look at the assembly plugin JIRAs, > but > it's hard to trawl that since so many JIRAs reference the word dependency. > It's not clear to me whether we benefited from a freak bug that was to our > advantage in the 2.2-SNAPSHOT version or whether all the other versions > have > a bug/bugs. > > Kelvin. > > 2008/6/2 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I have pinned down the change that caused the absence of EMF jars in the > > distribution zip to be the switch from the maven assembly plugin version > > 2.2-SNAPSHOT to the 2.2-beta-2 as altered here [1]. I hope to look at > > this again soon, but have to stop for now. If anyone has any views on > what > > version we should be using please pipe up. > > > > Kelvin. > > > > [1] > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?r1=628691&r2=642349&pathrev=642349&diff_format=h > > > > Kelvin. > > > > 2008/5/19 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the samples at the moment. > >> > >> Also, I found that with a combination of using IBM JDK 1.5 and maven > 2.0.7 > >> I got hit by http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-135 when trying > to > >> build from the top. We say in our BUILDING doc that 2.0.7 is OK, > perhaps > >> if we need to respin we should raise that in order to avoid IBM JDK > users > >> hitting this issue. It's fine with 2.0.9 > >> > >> Kelvin. > >> > >> > >> 2008/5/18 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> Please review and vote on the SDO 1.1.1 release. > >>> > >>> The artifacts including binary and source distributions, staging maven > >>> repo > >>> and release notes are available at > >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> > >>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>. > >>> The only difference between this and the 1.1 release is the fix for > >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2240. > >>> > >>> +1 from me. > >>> > >>> ...ant > >>> > >> > >> > > >
