I had an offline chat with Rajini. It seems we need just the framework jar of felix in the distro, but if the dependency on felix is declared as test scope in the pom, then that jar is not available to main phase of the build. If its not declared as test scope then we get 5 felix jars in the binary distro. Rajini's going to take a look when she gets some time.
Kelvin. 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The felix jars were introduced in the fix for "SDO does not work with > OSGi" [1] in commit 620763 [2]. I don't know if this is expected > behaviour, not being an OSGI expert. Comments anyone? > > Kelvin. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293 > [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=620763 > > 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The required libraries are >> >> sample-sdo-%RELEASE%.jar >> sdo-api-r2.1-%RELEASE%.jar >> tuscany-sdo-lib-%RELEASE%.jar >> tuscany-sdo-impl-%RELEASE%.jar >> tuscany-sdo-tools-%RELEASE%.jar >> codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar >> codegen-2.2.3.jar >> ecore-2.2.3.jar >> ecore-change-2.2.3.jar >> ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar >> common-2.2.3.jar >> xsd-2.2.3.jar >> stax-api-1.0.1.jar >> wstx-asl-3.2.0.jar >> >> with >> backport-util-concurrent being optional if you want threadsafe collections >> with Java 1.4 IIRC >> >> The felix jar inclusions were introduced some time between commit level >> 600913 and 627754; I'm working on narrowing this down at the moment. >> >> Kelvin. >> >> >> 2008/6/2 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> It is strange. >>> >>> Removing the <includes> at the bottom of the assembly bin.xml changes it >>> so >>> that the dependencies do get included again, but several felix >>> dependencies >>> also get dragged in. What is the complete list of jars that should be >>> included? >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:02 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > This failure also occurs with the 2.1 version and the 2.2-beta-1 >>> version. >>> > The current trunk version is 2.2-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, which I haven't >>> found in >>> > a repository yet, so the only version that seems ever to have worked >>> is >>> > the >>> > 2.2-SNAPSHOT version. I have taken a look at the assembly plugin JIRAs, >>> > but >>> > it's hard to trawl that since so many JIRAs reference the word >>> dependency. >>> > It's not clear to me whether we benefited from a freak bug that was to >>> our >>> > advantage in the 2.2-SNAPSHOT version or whether all the other versions >>> > have >>> > a bug/bugs. >>> > >>> > Kelvin. >>> > >>> > 2008/6/2 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> > >>> > > I have pinned down the change that caused the absence of EMF jars in >>> the >>> > > distribution zip to be the switch from the maven assembly plugin >>> version >>> > > 2.2-SNAPSHOT to the 2.2-beta-2 as altered here [1]. I hope to look >>> at >>> > > this again soon, but have to stop for now. If anyone has any views >>> on >>> > what >>> > > version we should be using please pipe up. >>> > > >>> > > Kelvin. >>> > > >>> > > [1] >>> > > >>> > >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?r1=628691&r2=642349&pathrev=642349&diff_format=h >>> > > >>> > > Kelvin. >>> > > >>> > > 2008/5/19 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> > > >>> > > I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the samples at the >>> moment. >>> > >> >>> > >> Also, I found that with a combination of using IBM JDK 1.5 and maven >>> > 2.0.7 >>> > >> I got hit by http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-135 when >>> trying >>> > to >>> > >> build from the top. We say in our BUILDING doc that 2.0.7 is OK, >>> > perhaps >>> > >> if we need to respin we should raise that in order to avoid IBM JDK >>> > users >>> > >> hitting this issue. It's fine with 2.0.9 >>> > >> >>> > >> Kelvin. >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> 2008/5/18 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> > >> >>> > >> Please review and vote on the SDO 1.1.1 release. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> The artifacts including binary and source distributions, staging >>> maven >>> > >>> repo >>> > >>> and release notes are available at >>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >>> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >>> > >>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>. >>> > >>> The only difference between this and the 1.1 release is the fix for >>> > >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2240. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> +1 from me. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> ...ant >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> >
