On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for Simon L as RM and for cutting the release over the weekend. > > BTW, any specific guidelines for adding changes to the 1.3 branch ? > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 to cut 1.3 branch. > > > > Raymond > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM > > To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Release 1.3? > > > >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Mike Edwards wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > >> Simon Laws wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since > > > >>> > >>> >>> then > >>> > >>> there > >>> > >>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It > feels > >>> > like > >>> > >>> the > >>> > >>> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list > over > >>> the > >>> > >>> last > >>> > >>> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion > > >>> > >>> >>> that > >>> I > >>> > >>> can > >>> > >>> see; > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Better BPEL support > >>> > >>> Improvements to the domain manager app > >>> > >>> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing > >>> > >>> Support for validation monitoring > >>> > >>> Databinding improvements > >>> > >>> Performance improvements > >>> > >>> JSR250 annotation support > >>> > >>> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test > >>> > >>> Java 2 security enablement > >>> > >>> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime > >>> > >>> Lots of JIRA fixes. > >>> > >>> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum > up > >>> > >>> > >>> a > >>> > bit > >>> > >>> of > >>> > >>> publicity for our TLP graduation > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and > > >>> > >>> > >>> remove > >>> > the > >>> > >>> old > >>> > >>> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this > >>> > >>> > >>> separately) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> What else has been added or changed? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off > next > >>> week > >>> > >>> ready to cut a branch. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Simon > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Yes, I give a +1. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of > more > >>> > >> sophisticated itests/samples as well and the release will be a > good > >>> > spur. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Yours, Mike. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> I think this is a good time to do a 1.3 release. This would make > >>> > > the new runtime Java2WSDL generation available to Tuscany users, > >>> > > and resolve a number of issues with the previous code generation > >>> > > that used Axis2. The other improvements listed are valuable as > well. > >>> > > > >>> > > Simon > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > OK, so it looks like people want to do this > >>> > > >>> > Re. Luciano's question about RM. I'll volunteer to be RM this time > > >>> > round > >>> > and > >>> > all help is greatly appreciated. If though Luciano (or anyone else > for > >>> that > >>> > matter) you are keen to RM this time then I won't fight you for it;-) > >>> Would > >>> > seem a little unfair though as you did the last one. > >>> > > >>> > Anyone have things they are working one that would stop us moving > > >>> > forward > >>> > with this and cutting the R1.3 branch at the end of this week? > >>> > > >>> > Regards > >>> > > >>> > Simon > >>> > > >>> > >>> +1 to Simon as RM and taking the branch at the end of this week. > >>> > >>> ...ant > >> > >> > >> We'll I'm not hearing any comments against. I'll probably take the > branch > >> at > >> the weekend when things are a little quieter. I've still got changes I > >> want > >> to make in trunk before then which are taking longer than I had hoped. > So > >> if > >> everyone could get all the changes they want to make done by close of > play > >> Friday and ensure that we're getting a clean build then that will be a > >> good > >> base to take the branch from. Any problems let me know. > >> > >> Simon > >> > > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany Committer > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > Hi Luciano I'd like to keep a pretty close watch on how we change the branch this time so I would like all changes to be backed up with a JIRA even for committers. As for what changes we allow. I think we'll assume we are functionally complete when we cut the branch and concentrate on any JIRA that people think need to go into 1.3 to make it a good release. As long as we do that through JIRA we should be able to control it. I'll open the 1.3 JIRA category when I cut the branch. Simon
