On Jan 2, 2007, at 6:04 AM, Francesco Furfari wrote:
Thank you Jean-Sebastian,
I was supposing that it wasn't so easy to answer, especially to my
last question, but it didn't discourage me from continuing ;-).
Just to inform you, there was general consensus respect the SCA
initiative, as well as caution because the work is still in progress.
Obviously there were also motivations against the SCA adoption as
for example the reuse of code already developed by the involved
partners ;-). But we are still defining the conceptual model so
there is room for any (maybe mixed) solution ... people asked me
references.
What I haven't found is a roadmap about the SCA specification, even
an approximate date for the version 1.0 can ease managers to go
over their hesitation (but I understand that it can produce
negative effects).
Working in team we are particularly interested in the deployment
aspects of a service networks, so next months I've intention to
investigate such area to give them a practical demo of how SCA can
help our collaborative work.
Ciao Francesco,
The SCA specification is targeting Q1 this year. Are you specifically
interested in the Java implementation, C++ implementation or both?
I'm happy to help answer any questions you have on the former as well
as the SCA specs.
Buon anno!
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]