Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
The one in the host-embedded is used for unit testing, and to make
sure extensions are working ok. The one in samples, is basically a
copy, and it's used as an example of how to build a new implementation
type. As you said in the first e-mail, the two are basically the same,
and I'd recommend you to stick with one of them (the sample version
that is more well documented)
Yes. Stick to the sample and ignore the test case, I'm going to change
the test case to avoid confusion in the future.
Done. I have refactored the test case and also cleaned up the CRUD
sample and added more relevant comments to it.
Hope this helps.
I added more comments to the implementation-pojo-extension module too.
You may want to take a look at it, it's another example that shows how
to write a (simplistic) implementation extension for Java implementation
classes with a default constructor, public methods and optional init and
destroy methods.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]