SCADomain.newInstance(compositeName), which is used in many of the Tuscany
samples to create a DefaultSCADomain works only if
contextClassLoader.getResource(compositeName) returns a file:// or jar://
URL. This is broken when Tuscany is run under OSGi, since Apache Felix
returns a bundle:// URL and Equinox returns a bundleresource:// URL for the
composite. At the moment, existing samples can be run under an OSGi based
Tuscany only by using a custom classloader as the thread context
classloader, which returns file:// or jar:// URLs from its getResource
method, like Jason described(
http://marc.info/?l=tuscany-user&m=119559170431301&w=2).

DefaultSCADomain determines the location of the SCA contribution relative to
the composite or sca-contribution.xml. This file is first loaded using
applicationClassLoader.getResource(), and root of the contribution folder or
jar file  is determined from the resource URL. Since bundle:// URLs dont
correspond to a folder or jar file, they are not correctly processed by
Tuscany. To fix this in Tuscany, we need a BundleContributionProcessor
similar to JarContributionProcessor (at the moment, artifacts from bundle
contributions are read using the JarContributionProcessor). The bundle
contribution processor should either 1) read the stream using the bundle URL
and use OSGi bundle API to read its artifacts or 2) find the actual file
location corresponding to the bundle and read it using the
JarContributionProcessor. Unfortunately, both of these require OSGi specific
code in the contribution processing logic.

addContribution() methods for SCANode and SCADomain work with file:// URLs
which specify bundle contributions, and these are resolved correctly using
OSGi. But at the moment, they cannot process bundle:// URLs. A proper fix
for DefaultSCADomain will also enable bundle:// or bundleresource:// URLs to
be used in addContribution().

Since this is a problem only when Tuscany is run under OSGi, and any fix
would require adding OSGi specific code into the contribution processing
code in Tuscany, I am not sure if this needs fixing in Tuscany, or the
workaround of overriding the context classloader is sufficient.

Thoughts?




On 11/23/07, Peter Kriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it sounds very much like Felix Meschberger's conclusion.
> Converting URLs to strings and then back to URLs, which is not
> necessary and not guaranteed to work.
>
> Anyway, I'd like to know why someone needs to escape to Equinox hooks
> when it should work on standard OSGi level ...
>
> Kind regards,
>
>     Peter Kriens
>
> RS> Hi,
>
> RS> Tuscany supports OSGi bundle contributions which are currently loaded
> using
> RS> the Apache Felix OSGi runtime by default. These contributions can
> contain
> RS> composite files and other meta-data which are  loaded using OSGi and
> RS> passed around as URLs. Tests for OSGi contributions are run under
> Felix with
> RS> urlhandlers set, so we dont have any trouble with bundle:// URLs
> returned by
> RS> resources located using Felix (Tuscany calls openConnection and
> openStream
> RS> on these urls).
>
> RS> Are the Eclipse RCP apps run without an URL stream handler to handle
> RS> bundleresource:// URLs?
>
>
> RS> Thank you...
>
> RS> Regards,
>
> RS> Rajini
>
> RS> On 11/23/07, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I don't think it is a bug in eclipse (just from the likeliness point of
> >> view). What I do not know is, what Tuscany does with the URLs returned.
> >> If they would just open a stream on the URL, there would be no issue at
> >> all, because the URls are backed by handlers supporting opening the
> >> streams.
> >>
> >> If on the other they convert the URls to Strings and later want to
> >> create URLs from the strings again, they are hosed. But I assume, this
> >> is then a bug/issue in Tuscany rather than in Eclipse. In fact, they
> >> might run into the same troubles with Felix or just about any
> >> framework...
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Felix
> >>
> >> Am Freitag, den 23.11.2007, 08:55 +0000 schrieb Rob Walker:
> >> > Peter
> >> >
> >> > On a  very quick read thru this - tbh - it sounds like a bug/feature
> of
> >> > their OSGi implementation.
> >> >
> >> > I'm 99% sure we use classloader getResource() calls under Felix, and
> the
> >> > felix classloaders correctly resolve them to bundle URL references
> which
> >> > can then be used in a normal way. Pretty sure you need the URL
> handler
> >> > feature enabled, since I think as Jason points out the URL returned
> has
> >> > a custom protocol type that the specific framework implementation
> needs
> >> > to handle.
> >> >
> >> > A possible alternative may be for them to use getResourceAsStream()
> if
> >> > viable - since this will resolve the URL and open it for them.
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> > -- Rob
> >> >
> >> > Peter Kriens wrote:
> >> > > I noticed this mail:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-user/200711.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> >> > >
> >> > > This is from the Tuscany project and seem to struggle with resource
> >> > > handling in OSGi. Anybody knows Jason Clark and can discuss this
> with
> >> > > him? As far as I can see, it can all be done with the bundle
> methods
> >> > > or by creating new URLs.
> >> > >
> >> > > Kind regards,
> >> > >
> >> > >    Peter Kriens
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> Peter Kriens                              Tel +33467542167
> 9C, Avenue St. Drézéry                    AOL,Yahoo: pkriens
> 34160 Beaulieu, France                    ICQ 255570717
> Skype pkriens                             Fax +1 8153772599
>
>


-- 
Thank you...

Regards,

Rajini

Reply via email to