> Perl and Python both resist the introduction of a switch statement > which I (and many others) feel is the most elegant way to express > what it does.
Interesting. What do you feel is the problem with elif? Its not even much more typing and allows for much more expressive test conditions. Switch is really only useful for a single subset of tests. And of course switch statements are notorious bug factories and maintenance nightmares - the reason why OOP tries to eliminate them wherever possible. > I also wish Python would take up the C ternary operator > which is also quite clear and elegant. :-) You joke I assume? ':?' is clear? Its succinct but also prone to abuse. I don't think the Python equivalent foo = x and y or z is much less elegant than foo = x ? y : z > ... To paraphrase the famous quote: There are no good programming languages, just some that aren't as bad in some situations. Absolutely true. I still use assembler occasionally, and I even like bits of COBOL (although not much, its my least favourite language!). And probably my favourite language of all is Logo even though I've never used it for any serious projects. Alan G. _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
