On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Dick Moores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 08:58 PM 8/13/2008, bob gailer wrote: >> >> One thing I really like about Python Win is the integrated debugger, which >> takes no time to start up. SPE OTOH uses WinPDB which runs as a separate >> process that takes (in the demo video) 15 seconds to start (each time it is >> requested)! Since I depend heavily on the debugger that delay would drive me >> crazy! > > Hm, I just measured how long Ulipad takes to get going with WinPDB, a > plug-in: 20 seconds, but 10 seconds for a restart. > > Other than the time to start, could you compare debugging with Python Win > and debugging with WinPDB? > > Thanks, > > Dick Moores >
Isn't that a bit system-dependent? PyWin starts for me in <5 seconds on my spankin' new 2 gb ram, E8400 at 3 ghz. SPE (the .pyw file) took ~7 seconds to start. (Haven't WinPDB to test..) Omer. _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
