On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Dinesh B Vadhia <dineshbvad...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Kent > > The citation without the name is perfect (and this appears to be how most > citation parsers work). There are two issues in the test run: > > 1. The parallel citation 422 U.S. 490, 499 n. 10, 95 S.Ct. 2197, 2205 n. > 10, 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975) is resolved as: > > 422 U.S. 490 (1975) > 499 n. 10 (1975) > 95 S.Ct. 2197 (1975) > 2205 n. 10 (1975) > 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975) > > instead of as: > > 422 U.S. 490, 499 n. 10 (1975) > 95 S.Ct. 2197, 2205 n. 10 (1975) > 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975) > > ie. parsing the second page references should pick up all alphanumeric chars > between the commas.
So 499 n. 10 is a page reference? I can't pick up all alphanumeric chars between commas, that would include a second reference. Kent _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
